The scientific community has to judge the quality of decisions based on published data without knowing the specifics of their calculation. Meanwhile, the monopoly ownership of the calculation methodology for a long time allows it to be quite easy and covertly from the scientific community to constantly "improve" reporting and planning information on the pace and effectiveness of economic development, in particular due to hidden price changes that are not taken into account by statistics, and sometimes by "transforming" the methodology for calculating indicators, as it was in 1986-1987. when the economic growth rate was calculated without taking into account the decline in the production of alcoholic beverages. Among the problems requiring urgent solutions, the primary problem is the methods and methodology of calculating national income, which characterizes the achieved level of social production and the possibility of its growth in the future.


In statistics and planning, two indicators of national income are used: produced and used for consumption and accumulation. When these indicators are calculated at comparable prices, in which indicators of five-year and long-term plans are developed, as well as their implementation is analyzed, there is a significant gap between the volumes of national income created and consumed. For example, the increase in national income generated over the 9-11 five—year period was 90%, and the increase in used income was 79%. Considering that the percentage of national income growth was 2.8 billion rubles in 1971-1975, 3.9 billion rubles in 1976-1980, and 4.9 billion rubles in 1981-1985, the noted difference in rates, according to our calculations, led to a discrepancy between the amounts of national income received and spent in 1971-1985 of about 40 billion rubles. There are significant discrepancies in the average annual growth rates both for the entire period and for the five-year plans. Statistical data show that the national income produced consistently exceeds the income used, both in terms of growth rates and in absolute terms.


The objective basis for the discrepancy between the indicators of national income produced and used lies in constant and unrelated changes in the structure of production and the proportions of product distribution. The methods of evaluating products in the field of their production and use also differ significantly. However, the analysis shows that this discrepancy can be reduced by changing the current practice of appropriate calculations. There are also some ways to solve the problem. Официальное iOS-приложение Melbet доступно жителям в Россоши по ссылке Melbet скачать ios . После установки на iPhone открывается личный кабинет с бонусами и полной линией ставок на спорт. Вывод средств осуществляется быстро. Горячая линия: 8 (800) 779-44-12.